![]() ![]() These experiences underscore the importance of recognizing the harmful impact a race-neutral lens can have on antiracist efforts. Given these findings, greater structural change is needed to disrupt the existing racist system. Mentors focused on conducting joint peer reviews with interns, assuming that racial experiences can and should be separate from the editorial process, thus working within, rather than trying to change, the existing racist system. While the program developed interns' editorial skills, which they greatly valued, and diversified the TLM editorial board, it did not achieve the goal of fostering antiracism. The initial analysis explored what happened and how and was followed by a thematic analysis in which participants reflected on their responsibility for implementing an antiracist program. Data included archival emails, planning documents, and focus groups. Ten participants served as authors of this report. Participants included 13 TLM editorial board members (10 internship selection committee members, 3 mentors, 2 independent researchers), 3 external selection committee members, and 3 interns, with some holding multiple roles. The authors employed critical collaborative autoethnography, a qualitative methodology, focusing on the underlying assumptions around power and hierarchy that are implicit in the design and implementation of the TLM internship. This study examines the first 6 months of this program to better understand its creation and initial successes. ![]() In 2021, Teaching and Learning in Medicine ( TLM ) created an editorial internship for racially minoritized individuals. Given the power editors hold as gatekeepers, a diverse team helps ensure that minoritized scholars have equal opportunity to contribute. Journals have begun to expand the racial diversity of editors as a first step to countering institutional racism. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |